John deere dealer consolidating free xxx sex pic web sites
In Phase 1, the focus of the SQS assessment was on team level process areas, including, risk management, service system development, work planning, decision analysis and resolution, capacity and availability management, service delivery, configuration and change management, and incident resolution and prevention.
Because we are using the factory scenario within operations, the process areas targeted for improvement were work planning (agile and lean) so we can document our alignment and work flows, and service delivery (service portfolio) so we could establish a system for measuring for cycle time.
During Phase 1, to support reporting and monitoring, we established a GIO quality dashboard to measure the lagging performance metrics that defined our product quality, delivery quality, and support quality, as well as our customer satisfaction scores.
Analyzing the pre (yellow) and post (green) scores show that improvements in capability and maturity were made across the related process areas during every iteration/spiral.
The goal is to eliminate the use of many different tools that impact our ability to share, communicate, automate, and generate common metrics.
We will be implementing standard processes to support service management, incident management, change and release management, and problem management.
Capacity planning models and templates, a service management process knowledge center, and a service catalog tool configuration and pilot are all driving capability and maturity improvements throughout GIO.
During Phase 2, SQS assessments are being done at the service lane level, instead of at the team level, to support our organizational learning model with better efficiency.
This lab experiment is also coached by the Quality Manager.
The scale ranges from 0, where something in the process is not done at all, to 5, where analysis and metrics help drive improvement of consistent process planning and execution.
These scores also continue to provide information about where we still have the largest capability gaps as indicated by the score and are the input to our learning and phase building approach.
The data is still coming in from these teams, but our initial results are very promising.
Phase 2 areas for improvement, which were derived from the Phase 1 SQS results, are capacity and availability management, configuration management, and service system development.